In this respect, it is surprising that the documentary preserves its validity despite the 45 years that have passed. He’s a bold criticism of the capitalism and the advertising world.
#John berger ways of seeing why we need full
The book consists of 7 chapters full of black and white pictures, of which 3 are only pictures, so there are four text sections left. It seems that if we think that the best-suited media can not always be a book, it would be sometimes a poem, sometimes a movie, sometimes a music, sometimes a photo, sometimes a performance, sometimes a documentary.
#John berger ways of seeing why we need update
It should be useful to update this definition. In general intellectual belief, “books are good, books are always great” is a myth. I have to wonder about the book and then confess that I understood it when I watched the document with the actual version of the work. However, the BBC documentary broadcast in 4 section I found very successful: The book gives it by narrowing it down because of its graphical weakness but things change if you look at the document. In the meantime, show our capitalist world in all nudity. The aim of the work is to show that the roots of today’s advertising approach come from the oil painting tradition. Also the title has a big challenge: Ways of Seeing! I guess it will start with a variety of perspectives and touch all the artistic approaches, it does not. The book disappointed me especially in the sense of graphic design (ie legibility, typography, type, printing). (Regeneration evokes “reanimation.”) The words that do not fit because old translations may cause a sense of disturbance it is useful to add the original word in parentheses especially in scientific translations. When I realized that the word “regeneration / yeniden canlandırma” towards the middle of the book was actually a “reproduction / reprodüksiyon”, I had a late enlightenment. At first in terms of graphic design I would have been angry to Turkish translation, but I see the original edition is the same. But the book did not have to be this very sloppy. The reason is simple, it emerged as documentary work. I will defend the reason why we should not watch the documentary of “Vision Forms” instead of book fetishism. In this article I compared the book with the Ways of Seeing document which was prepared by John Berger in 1972, which we lost on.
0 kommentar(er)
